CLEANER PRODUCTION AS A DRIVER OF GREEN COMPETITIVENESS

Chygryn O.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine

Artyukhova N.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine

Vasylyna T.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine


Pages: 152-162


Original language: Ukrainian

DOI: 10.21272/1817-9215.2020.2-17

Summary:

In the modern condition the cleaner production is a necessary component for achieving sustainable development. Promotion of the company’s green competitiveness impossible without implementation the green technologies and cleaner production. The purpose of the paper is generalizing the main approaches to understanding the cleaner production given the opportunity to emphasize its key elements. Authors underlined the main targets of cleaner production. For promoting better understanding of cleaner production among companies the nine guiding principles were formulated. The main spheres where principles have to work: products and packaging, services, wastes, ecologically incompatible byproducts, energy and materials, technologies, and work practices, work places, security and well-being, communities around work places. They connected with the all stage of production and commerce process. In the paper determined corporate strategies for successful implementation of cleaner production. The key elements of strategies are efficiency and implementation of renewable energy technologies. In the paper authors generalized the main spheres cleaner production. The author emphasizes that the implementation of cleaner production practices nee d a wide understanding of the necessity of their development and providing across the society. Thus, the co-benefits of its promotion are increased productivity, established employer moral and green ethics, improved competitive positioning, enhanced green corporate image and companies’ reputation. Author emphasises that cleaner production promotion has to include activities connected with raising stakeholder’s environmental awareness, compilation and dissemination of up-to-date information on cleaner production practices and green technologies; human resources development; providing demonstration projects in different sub-sectors and locations in the country. Generalizing the scientific background about the perspectives and challenges of cleaner production implementation give the opportunity to formulate the main barriers of cleaner production development.

Keywords:
pollution, cleaner production, sustainable development, economic development, environmental impact, strategies, benefits.

Reference:
1.Abaas, M. S. M., Chygryn, O., Kubatko, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2018). Social and economic drivers of national economic development: the case of OPEC countries. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(4), 155-168.
2.Abrhám, J.; Lžičař, P. 2018. Risk management in the sustainable development: analysis of a selected key industry, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 8(2): 171-180. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.8.2(5)
3.Androniceanu, A., Popescu, C.R.(2017). An Inclusive Model for an Effective Development of the Renewable Energies Public Sector. Administratieve Management Public, (28), 81-96
4.Bappayo, A., Maidunoma, Z. (2018). Role Of Radio Stations In Creating Awareness On Proper Solid Waste Management Practice In Yobe State, Nigeria. SocioEconomic Challenges, 3(2), 95-102. DOI: 10.21272/sec.3(2).95- 102.2018
5.Bhandari, M. P. (2018). The Problems and Consequences of the Biodiversity Conservation: A Case Study from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan. SocioEconomic Challenges, 2(1), 6-20. DOI: 10.21272/sec.2(1).6-20.2018
6.Bilan, Y., Streimikiene, D., Vasylieva, T., Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T., & Pavlyk, A. (2019a). Linking between Renewable Energy, CO2 Emissions, and Economic Growth: Challenges for Candidates and Potential Candidates for the EU Membership. Sustainability, 11(6), 1528.
7.Bilan, Y., Vasilyeva, T., Lyeonov, S., & Bagmet, K. (2019b). Institutional complementarity for social and economic development. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 103-115.
8.Cebula J., Chygryn O., Pimonenko T. and Chayen S.V. (2018). Biogas as an Alternative Energy Source in Ukraine and Israel: Current Issues and Benefits’. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Vol. 21, No. (5/6), pp.421–38.
9.Chygryn, O, Hens, L., Melnyk L., Matsenko, O., & Gonzales, C. C. (2019). Transport Economics and Sustainable Development in Ukraine. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 272-284.
10. Chygryn, O. Y., & Krasniak, V. S. (2015). Theoretical and applied aspects of the development of environmental investment in Ukraine. Marketing and management of innovations, (3), 226-234.
11. Chygryn, O., Petrushenko, Y., Vysochyna, A., & Vorontsova, A. (2018a). Assessment of Fiscal Decentralization Influence on Social and Economic Development. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(4), 69- 84.
12. Chygryn, O., Pimonenko, T., Luylyov, O., & Goncharova, A. (2018b). Green Bonds like the Incentive Instrument for Cleaner Production at the Government and Corporate Levels Experience from EU to Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Management, 9(7), 1443-1456.
13. Chygryn, O. Yu., Scherbak, A. S. (2011). Analysis of the problem of the introduction the environmentally friendly production in Ukraine. The mechanism of economic regulation. 1, 235-241 [In Ukranian].
14. Dieleman H. and Cramer J. (2004). Strategies to implement cleaner production: towards a systems approach. Erasmus Centre for Sustainability and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
15. Dieleman, H., (2007). Cleaner production and innovation theory. Social experiments as a new model to engage in cleaner production. Revista internacional de contaminación ambiental, 23(2),79-94.
16. El-Kholy, O. (2002). Cleaner production: Encyclopedia of global environmental change, J.Wiley& Sons.
17. Falkowski, K.(2018). The importance of energy resources for Azerbaijan’s international competitiveness. Journal of International Studies, 11(4), 44-56. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-4/3 18. Fogarassy, C., Neubauer, E., Mansur, H., Tangl, A., Olah, J., Popp, J. (2018). The main transition management issues and the effects of environmental accounting on financial performance – with focus on cement industry. Administratieve Management Public. (31), 52-66, doi: 1024818/amp/2018.31-04. 19. Getting to Green -A Sourcebook of Pollution Management Policy. Tools for Growth and Competitiveness. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/environment/publication/sourcebook-pollutionmanagement-policy-tools 20. Glavic, P., Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 15, 1875-1885. 21. Hájek, P., Zhunissova, G., Oralbaeva, Z., Zhidebekkyzy, A., & Baidildina, A. (2019). Competitiveness and economic profit analysis of Kazakhstan’s poultry companies. Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 147-164. doi: 10.14254/2071- 8330.2019/12-2/9 22. Hens, L., Block, C., Cabello-Eras, J., Sagastume-Gutierez, A., Garcia-Lorenzo, D., Chamoro, C., Mendoza, H., Vandecasteele, H. (2017). On the evolution of “Cleaner production” as a concept and a practice. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.082 23. Kalili, N.R. (2015). From cleaner production to sustainable development: The role of Academia. Journal of Cleaner Production. 96, 30-43. 24. Lyeonov, S. V., Vasylieva, T. A., & Lyulyov, O. V. (2018). Macroeconomic stability evaluation in countries of lower-middle income economies. Scientific Bulletin of National Mining University, (1).
25. Lyulyov, O., Chygryn, O., Pimonenko, T. (2018). National brand as a marketing determinant of macroeconomic stability. Marketing and management of innovations, (3), 142-152. DOI: 10.21272/mmi.2018.3-12
26. Lyulyov, O., Pimonenko, T. (2017b) Lotka-Volterra model as an instrument of the investment and innovative processes stability analysis. Marketing and management of innovations, (1), 159-169. DOI: 10.21272/mmi.2017.1-14
27. Matsenko O., Chygryn O., Taranovsky V., Dolgodush A. 2011. Socio-ecological and economic problems of water supply in Ukraine. The mechanism of economic regulation. 4. P. 140-147.
28. Mačaitytė, I., Virbašiūtė, G. (2018). Volkswagen Emission Scandal and Corporate Social Responsibility – A Case Study. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(1), 6-13. Doi: 10.21272/bel.2(1).6-13.2018
29. Mura, L., & Kljucnikov, A. (2018b). Small Businesses in Rural Tourism and Agrotourism: Study from Slovakia. Economics and Sociology, 11(3), 286-300. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/17
30. Mura, L., Marchevska, M., Dubravska, M. (2018a). Slovak retail business across panel regression model. Marketing and management of innovations, (4), 203-211. DOI: 10.21272/mmi.2018.4-18
31. OECD (2018). Glossary of statistical terms. https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=820
32. Okuneviciute Neverauskiene, L., & Rakauskiene, O. G. (2018). Identification of employment increasing possibilities in the context of the EU socioeconomic environment evaluation: The case of Lithuania. Economics and Sociology, 11(4), 51- 68. doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-4/3
33. Peterková, J., Zapletalová, S. (2018). Evaluation of the usability of selected innovation concepts for managing innovation activities. Business Administration and Management. 21(4), 141-158
34. T, Chygryn O., Luylov O. (2018). Green Entrepreneurship as an Integral Part of the National Economy Convergence. National Security & Innovation Activities: Methodology, P
olicy and Practice: monograph / edited by Dr. of Economics, Prof. O. Prokopenko, Ph.D in Economics V. Omelyanenko, Ph.D in Technical Sciences, Assoc. Prof. Yu. Ossik. – Ruda Śląska: Drukarnia i Studio Graficzne Omnidium, 2018. –p.358-365
35. Popoola, M. A., Brimah, A. N., Gbadeyan, R. A. (2018). Entrepreneurship Practice: As a Means of Poverty
36. Rosokhata, A., Rybina O., Derykolenko, A., & Makerska, V. (2020a). Improving the Classification of Digital Marketing Tools for the Industrial Goods Promotion in the Globalization Context. Research in World Economy, 11 (4), Special Issue, 42 – 52. doi:10.5430/rwe.v11n4p42
37. Rosokhata, A., & Sager, L. (2020b). Individual issues of economic security: the study of the impact of changes in migration processes on countries economic and innovative development. Visnyk of Sumy State University, Economics series, 1, 62-74. doi: 10.21272/ 1817-9215.2020.1-07
38. Reduction in Southwestern Nigeria. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(4), 83-88. http://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2(4).83-88.2018.
39. Prindle, W.R. (2010). From Shop Floor to Top Floor: Best Business Practices in Energy Efficiency. Fairfax, Virginia: Pew Center on Global Climate Change, ICF International.
40. Srinivas, H. (2015). The role of local governments in fostering business partnerships for environmental sustainability. Policy Analysis Series. https://www. gdrc. org/sustbiz/bizpartnerships.html.
41. Tommaso, F. (2018). What are the Costs and Benefits of a International Corporate Governance Reregulation? Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 2(3), 62-67. doi: 10.21272/fmir.2(3).62-67.2018.
42. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable
43. United Nations Environment Programme Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics (UNEP DTIE) – CP Assessment in Industries (2012). http://www.uneptie.org/PC/cp/understanding_cp/cp_ industries.htm
44. Vargas-Hernández, J. G., Rodríguez, C. R. F. (2018). Leadership Styles as a Challenge to Generate Innovation Environments in the Companies of the 21st Century. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(4), 64-73. http://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2(4).64-73.2018.
45. Vasilyeva, T., Sysoyeva, L., & Vysochyna, A. (2016). Formalization of factors that are affecting stability of Ukraine banking system. Risk governance & control: financial markets & institutions, 6(4), 7-11.
46. Vasylieva, N. (2019). Improvement of Agricultural Management: Functional Comparative Approach. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(1), 227–238.
 47. Vasylieva, T., Lyeonov, S., Lyulyov, O., & Kyrychenko, K. (2018). Macroeconomic stability and its impact on the economic growth of the country. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(1), 159-170.
48. Veleva, V., Ellenbecker, V. (2001). Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production. 9, 519–549.
49. Vojtech, F.; Levický, M.; Filip, S. 2019. Economic policy for sustainable regional development: a case study of Slovak Republic, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 8(4): 597- 608. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.8.4(4)
50. White, A., Zinkl, D. Raising standardization. The Environmental Forum, January–February, 1998.
51. Yaacoub, A., Fresner, J. (2006). Half is enough - An Introduction to Cleaner Production.Beirut, Lebanon: LCPC Press.