EDUCATION MODELS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF MANAGEMENT OF INTELECTULA CAPITAL: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

D. Pudryk

Odesa customs of the State Customs Service,
Odesa, Ukraine

O. Kwilinski

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine

T. Vasylyna

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine


Pages: 244-252


Original language: Ukrainian

DOI: 10.21272/1817-9215.2021.1-28

Summary:

Education internationalisation promotes intellectual capital migration whose goal is to gain equal access to quality education. The competition for highly qualified labour resources is intensifying from year to year. The high developed countries developed the mechanism for increasing the efficiency of the education system and the rapid integration of migrants into the country's multicultural environment, eliminating social, economic, and cultural barriers. The paper aims to analyse the modern education systems in the context of attracting intellectual capital to the country. To identify scientific patterns in research on the outlined issues, the authors conducted a biometric analysis of 804 scientific publications published in Journals indexed by the Scopus. VOSviewer and Scopus Tools Analysis tools are used for bibliometric analysis. The authors determine that the growth of publishing activity on the subject has occurred since 2000. The article identifies the TOP-10 countries and researchers by the number of publications devoted to the study of education and intellectual capital outflows for 1990-2020. The ratio of private and public universities among the studied countries showed that the share of public universities is higher in most countries. One of the criteria for selecting a destination country for educational migration is the education quality in the country. The authors analysed the rankings of countries on higher education quality according to the QS Higher Education System Strength Rankings and the Human Development Index in 2020. In order to compare countries in terms of intellectual capital outflows, the authors analysed the positions of countries in the Human Flight and Brain Drain Index. It is found that the leading countries in the education quality have smaller amounts of intellectual capital outflow. The points of attraction of the Human Flight and Brain Drain Index change in Ukraine were in 2014–2015, after which the value of this index began to decrease gradually. In 2018, the value of this index began to grow, which indicates an increase in brain drain from Ukraine. Given these trends, the Ukrainian government needs to study the experience of leading countries in reforming the education system to improve its quality and reduce the outflow of intellectual capital.

Keywords:
immigration, emigration, education, costs, student, university, lifelong learning, labor resources.

Reference:
  1. Budz, I. (2016). The British model of gifted schoolchildren education as part of national policy. Bulletin of the Cherkasy Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University. Series "Pedagogical Sciences", 32 (365).
  2. Vinnikova, L. F. (2014). Significant aspects of the British higher education system. Scientific notes [Nizhyn State University. Nikolai Gogol]. Psychological and pedagogical sciences, (1), 226-229.
  3. Krasilnikova, G. (2014). The system of monitoring the quality of higher education in British universities: experience for Ukraine. Comparative professional pedagogy, (4 (3)), 138-144.
  4. Ogienko, O. I. (2014). Multicultural principles of higher education in Great Britain, the United States, Canada and Australia. Editorial Board, 173.
  5. Kharlamova, G. O. (2017). The British model of higher education funding: lessons for Ukraine. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, (5), 58-66.
  6. Beine, M., Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2001). Brain drain and economic growth: Theory and evidence.Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 275-289. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00133-4
  7. Beine, M., Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2008). Brain drain and human capital formation in developing countries: Winners and losers.Economic Journal, 118(528), 631-652. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02135.x
  8. Bollard, A., Mckenzie, D., Morten, M., & Rapoport, H. (2011). Remittances and the brain drain revisited: The microdata show that more educated migrants remit more.World Bank Economic Review, 25(1), 132-156. doi:10.1093/wber/lhr013
  9. Cerdeira, L., Machado-Taylor, M. D. L., Cabrito, B., Patrocínio, T., Brites, R., Gomes, R., . . . Ganga, R. (2016). Brain drain and the disenchantment of being a higher education student in portugal.Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(1), 68-77. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2015.1126892
  10. Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, brain drain, and development.Journal of Economic Literature, 50(3), 681-730. doi:10.1257/jel.50.3.681
  11. Driouchi, A., Boboc, C., Kadiri, M., Ţiţan, E., & Zouag, N. (2012). Brain drains or brain gains in physicians emigration? evidence from MENA and east european countriesdoi:10.1007/978-3-642-27948-5_89 
  12. Human Development Index. (2020). Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
  13. Human flight and brain drain index. (2020). Available at: https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Ukraine/human_flight_brain_drain_index/
  14. Lien, D. (2006a). International accreditation and brain drain: A simple model.Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 335-340. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.08.005
  15. Lien, D. (2006b). On the optimal quality of domestic higher education programs.Economic Modelling, 23(2), 265-275. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2005.10.002
  16. Lien, D. (2008). Quality assurance program and brain drain.Education Economics, 16(1), 59-73. doi:10.1080/09645290701550724
  17. Lien, D., & Wang, Y. (2005). Brain drain or brain gain: A revisit.Journal of Population Economics, 18(1), 153-163. doi:10.1007/s00148-003-0174-x
  18. Lien, D., & Wang, Y. (2012). The effects of a branch campus.Education Economics, 20(4), 386-401. doi:10.1080/09645292.2010.488488
  19. Muula, A. S. (2005). Is there any solution to the "brain drain" of health professionals and knowledge from africa?Croatian Medical Journal, 46(1), 21-29.
  20. QS Higher Education System Strength Rankings (HESS) 2018. Available at: https://www.topuniversities.com/system-strength-rankings/2018 
  21. Saxenian, A. L. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in india and china.Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35-61. doi:10.1007/BF02686293
  22. Schiff, M. (2017). Ability drain: Size, impact, and comparison with brain drain under alternative immigration policies.Journal of Population Economics, 30(4), 1337-1354. doi:10.1007/s00148-017-0644-1
  23. Schiff, M., & Wang, Y. (2013). North-south trade-related technology diffusion and productivity growth: Are small states different?International Economic Journal, 27(3), 399-414. doi:10.1080/10168737.2012.660180
  24. (2020). Available at: https://www.scopus.com/
  25. Shimada, A. (2013). Wage inequality and human capital formation under migration possibilities.Australian Economic Papers, 52(3-4), 190-201. doi:10.1111/1467-8454.12016
  26. Shimada, A. (2019). The education policy challenge to the brain drain problem.International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 10(4), 335-355. doi:10.1504/IJEED.2019.102740
  27. World Higher Education (2020). Available at: https://www.whed.net/home.php