ANALYSIS OF GAS AND ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS: THE TARIFF REGULATION REVIEW

Kolosok S.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine

Vasylieva T.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine


Pages: 74-78


Original language: Ukrainian

DOI: 10.21272/1817-9215.2020.2-8

Summary:

The distribution of gas and electricity certainly belongs to the strategically important activities, the success of which affects the socio-economic situation in the country. Energy distribution companies not only transport energy to customers, but also balance energy consumption, thus influencing all economic processes. However, the energy sector is characterized by several limiting factors. Companies should optimize their activities through energy supply and reception planning, capacity forecasting, providing the necessary level of flexibility of energy systems and the ability to integrate diversified gas and electricity distribution operators. All this requires a balanced and detailed approach to the formation of tariff policy, which takes into account the cost of maintenance and maintenance of energy networks, justification of the costs of business operations given the possible social response to rising final tariffs for gas and electricity.

Therefore, the issue of tariff regulation in the energy sector requires a detailed study and analysis of best practices for setting tariffs for services for energy network operators. To this end, the study provided a review of the scientific literature on tariff regulation of gas and electricity distribution networks. The results of the study did not show significant elaboration of the topic but revealed only differences in views on optimal pricing for energy distribution networks in different countries.

Keywords:
gas distribution networks, electricity distribution networks, tariff regulation, smart grid, energy policy.

Reference:
1 Lummi, K., Rautiainen, A., Jarventausta, P., Heine, P., Lehtinen, J., & Hyvarinen, M. (2016). Cost-causation based approach in forming power-based distribution network tariff for small customers. Paper presented at the International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM, , 2016-July doi:10.1109/EEM.2016.7521251 Retrieved from www.scopus.com
2 Mancini, T., Mari, F., Melatti, I., Salvo, I., Tronci, E., Gruber, J. K., Elmegaard, L. (2015). User flexibility aware price policy synthesis for smart grids. Paper presented at the Proceedings - 18th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, DSD 2015, 478-485. doi:10.1109/DSD.2015.35 Retrieved from www.scopus.com
3 Tuunanen, J., Honkapuro, S., & Partanen, J. (2016). Power-based distribution tariff structure: DSO's perspective. Paper presented at the International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM, , 2016- July doi:10.1109/EEM.2016.7521249 Retrieved from www.scopus.com
4 Saldarriaga, C. A., Hincapié, R. A., & Salazar, H. (2013). A holistic approach for planning natural gas and electricity distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(4), 4052-4063. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2268859
5 Vandewalle, J., & D'Haeseleer, W. (2014). The impact of small scale cogeneration on the gas demand at distribution level. Energy Conversion and Management, 78, 137-150. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.005
6 Simshauser, P. (2016). Distribution network prices and solar PV: Resolving rate instability and wealth transfers through demand tariffs. Energy Economics, 54, 108-122. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.11.011
7 Hickey, C., Deane, P., McInerney, C., & Ó Gallachóir, B. (2019). Is there a future for the gas network in a low carbon energy system? Energy Policy, 126, 480-493. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.024
8 Shaw, R., Attree, M., & Jackson, T. (2010). Developing electricity distribution networks and their regulation to support sustainable energy. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5927-5937. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.046
9 Byrnes, L., Brown, C., Wagner, L., & Foster, J. (2016). Reviewing the viability of renewable energy in community electrification: The case of remote western australian communities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 470-481. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.273