COMPUTER-ASSISTED AUDIT TECHNIQUES: MAIN ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

Authors:

Serpeninova Iu.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine

y.serpeninova@uabs.sumdu.edu.ua

Makarenko S.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine

s_makarenko@i.ua

Lytvynova M.

Sumy State University,
Sumy, Ukraine

kotepopolski@gmail.com


Pages: 53-58


Original language: English

DOI: 10.21272/1817-9215.2019.3-7

Summary:

The authors substantiate the positive role of information technology in auditing and computer-assisted audit techniques for decision-making during various audit procedures. It is established that the International Auditing Practice Regulation IASP - "Computer Assisted Audit Techniques" play a fundamental role in regulating their use by auditors during rendering assurance and other related services. It was proved, that the auditors use computer-assisted audit techniques for various reasons. Moreover, it helps them to better plan and prepare themselves for all the challenges that today’s competing environment is bringing to them The key advantages of using computer-assisted audit techniques are substantiated, which are mainly refer to improving the efficiency and reliability of the auditor's work, reduce its complexity. Additional advantages concern the ability to create electronic worksheets on a centralized database, the possibility to detect fraud, continuous monitoring as a constant process of accumulating, analysing and reporting company database, testing the client's accounting software, testing of bulky volumes of database in a short time and with good accuracy, testing the database source, making comparisons between the results obtained swallow computer-assisted techniques and the results of classical tests, the ability to check specific risk. In contrast the most significant disadvantages and obstacles to the use of computer-assisted audit techniques were characterized. They are associated with high cost and complexity of implementation technologies as well as high initial cost of installation and maintaining computer-assisted audit techniques, inadequacy of simplified accounting software, overstatement of investigations, and high requirements to effectiveness of client database.

Keywords:
audit, information technology in audit, computer-assisted audit techniques.

Reference:
  1. Bierstaker, J., Janvrin, D., & Love, D. (2014). What factors influence auditors' use of computer-assisted audit techniques. Advances in Accounting, 30(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2013.12.005.
  2. Curtis, M. B., & Payne, E. A. (2008). An examination of contextual factors and individual characteristics affecting technology implementation decisions in auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 9(2), 104-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2007.10.002
  3. Gelinas, Davis, Knechel (2014). Business processes and information technology. Mason, OH: South-Western
  4. Hartono, J. (2012). Adoption of information technology on small businesses: The role of environment, organizational and leader determinant. International Journal of Business, Humanities, and Technology, 2(4).
  5. Ismail, N.A., & Abidin, A.Z. (2009). Perception towards the importance and knowledge of information technology among auditors in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 1(4), 61-69.
  6. Janvrin, D., Bierstaker, J. and Lowe, J. (2014), “An investigation of factors influencing the use of computer-related audit procedures”, Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 97-118.
  7. Janvrin, D., Bierstaker, J., & Love, D. (2008). An examination of audit information technology use and perceived importance. Accounting Horizons, 22(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.1.1
  8. Kim, H. J., Mannino, M., & Nieschwietz, R. J. (2009). Information technology Ismail, N.A., & Abidin, A.Z. (2009). Perception towards the importance and knowledge of information technology among auditors in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 1(4), 61-69
  9. Kotb and Roberts, C. (2011). The impact of E-business on the audit process: An investigation of the factors leading to change. International Journal of Auditing, 15, 150-175.
  10. Mahzan N. and Veerankutty F. (2011) IT Auditing Activities of Public Sector Auditors in Malaysia African Journal of Business Management 5 pp 1551-1563
  11. Mahzan, N., Muhammad, R., Shahimi, S., Yahya, Y., & Ahmad Radzi, N. (2009). 2008 survey report on CAATTs usage by internal auditors in Malaysia. Keeping in Touch, Institute of Internal Auditors Malaysia
  12. Moorthy, M. K., Seetharaman, A., Mohamed, Z., Gopalan, M., & San, L. H. (2011). The impact of information technology on internal auditing. African Journal of Business Management, 5(9), 3523-3539
  13. Nearon (2009). The role of internal auditors in ERP-Based organizations. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 5 (4), 514-526.
  14. Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2010). Auditor-In-Charge Characteristics and Going Concern Reporting Behavior: Does number of assignments, age and client fee dependence matter. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(2), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12035.
  15. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ isre.1110.0404.